日韩欧洲精品无码AV,99国产午夜精品一区二区天美,精品久久免费一区二区三区四区,久久综合图区亚洲综合图区,久久久久亚洲AV免费观看,精子网久久国产精品,亚洲AⅤ无码一区二区二三区性色,亚洲精品国产电影,亚洲资源在线观看,婷婷五月丁香在线

  • 
    
  • <ul id="yy6ca"></ul>
  • <del id="yy6ca"></del>
    <ul id="yy6ca"></ul>
    <strike id="yy6ca"><menu id="yy6ca"></menu></strike>
    Hotline:400-880-1556

    English




    Notice! IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission issued a number of interim resolutions on battery CTL

    Author:中認(rèn)聯(lián)科 time:2021-09-29 Ctr:1152

    On September 14, 2021, the IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission announced the latest CTL agreement on batteries. The three battery CTL interim resolutions released this time are as follows:

    01 CTL Interim Resolution

    PDSH 2182: Charging cut-off current

    PDSH 2182.png

    Question: According to IEC 62133-2:2017 clause 7.1.2, the second charging procedure prepared for the test project requires a charging cut-off current of 0.05 It A. When the battery manufacturer defines different charging cut-off currents, which cut-off battery should be used to set the charging conditions?

    Answer: 0.05It A should continue to be used.

    However, according to the manufacturer's requirements, a set of separate tests can be performed on samples prepared using the manufacturer's defined cut-off current for reference. When charging with the cut-off current specified by the manufacturer, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded.

    explain:

    The charge cut-off current has a great probability of affecting the charging state of the sample and the compliance of the test. Therefore, the value 0.05ItA defined in the standard should be strictly followed. On the other hand, considering that the charge cut-off current designed by the battery manufacturer for its products may be different to reflect the expected use conditions, it is allowed to set separately except for 0.05 ItA. The test of the charge cut-off current is for reference only. According to section 7.1.2, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded, regardless of the charge cut-off current value.

    02 CTL Interim Resolution

    PDSH 2161: Sample

    PDSH 2161.png

    Question: According to IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017 Clause 6, when evaluating batteries (packs), does the battery cell manufacturing time in the samples require no more than six months?

    Answer: Not required.

    explain:

    IEC SC21A WG4 confirmed that it plans to delete the sample requirement six months ago in the next edition of IEC 62133-2.

    Related topics:

    Q1: If the battery cell has not been tested separately, it will be sent together with the battery (pack) for evaluation and CB certification. In this case, can the battery manufacturing time be exempted?

    A: In this case, a separate full set of tests are required for the batteries, which is suitable for the requirement that the manufacturing time of the batteries cannot exceed six months.

    Q2: What needs to be paid attention to when applying for CB certification for battery (package) manufacturers in cross-border supply chains?

    A: The cycle of designing and producing batteries (packs) using cross-border purchased batteries may be longer. When the batteries (packs) are made, the battery manufacturing time may have exceeded six months. It is recommended that the cell manufacturer complete the CB certification in advance and provide cell samples and CB certificates. When the battery (pack) manufacturer subsequently performs the battery (pack) CB certification, it does not need to consider the issue of the cell manufacturing time exceeding six months.

    Q3: The battery (pack) that has obtained the CB certificate and report needs to be forwarded to other mark certification based on the CB certificate and report. Is the (temporary) decision also accepted?

    A: Based on the existing CB certificate and report transfer, it is based on the acceptance of the IEC standard and its CTL (temporary) resolution. However, it is not ruled out that the issuing agencies of different countries or regions have differentiated practices or requirements to issue their own marks.

    Q4: Regarding the content of this interim resolution, will you consider directly revising the standard in the future?

    A: The IEC SC21A working group WG4 plans to cancel the six-month sample requirement in the next edition of the 1.1 edition of IEC 62133-2.

    03 CTL Interim Resolution

    PDSH 1037A: Selection of series battery samples

    PDSH 1037A.png

    Sampling principles for battery series testing:

    This interim resolution expanded the battery standards applicable to the original resolution (No. DSH 1037) to include IEC 62133:2002, IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017, IEC 62619:2017 and IEC 62660 -3:2016. In order to facilitate a better understanding, some text adjustments have been made to the content of this resolution.

    Question: If a series of batteries of the same size, chemical system, voltage, and capacity are produced by the same manufacturer, if the safety compliance of the entire series is to be verified, which model should be selected for testing?

    Answer: In the above example, when the total capacity difference exceeds 20%, start from the highest capacity and calculate the capacity value with an amount lower than 20% of this value. Select those models in the series whose capacity is closest to the calculated value for testing. If the total capacity difference of a series of batteries does not exceed 20%, select the lowest, highest and closest model in the middle of the series for testing. Changes that may cause any test failure shall be considered as new models and shall be subjected to the required tests.

    explain:

    The type of change that may be considered different from the test type, which may cause any test results to fail, which may include but is not limited to:

    (a) The material of the positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte has changed;

    (b) Changes in protection devices, including hardware and software;

    (c) Changes in the safety design of battery cells or battery packs, such as exhaust valves;

    (d) Changes in the number of cells that make up; and

    (e) The change of the connection mode of the battery cell assembly.

    Related topics:

    Q1: In response to the requirements of different OEMs, manufacturers need to design soft-packed and square-shaped hard-shell batteries, and their electrical parameters are exactly the same. Can they be tested and certified as a single model or series?

    A: Considering that the physical structure of the soft case and the square hard case battery is quite different, and the difference directly affects the related test results and judgments, it needs to be considered as two independent battery projects.

    Q2: When there are differences in specific aspects, the battery cannot be tested and certified as a single model or series?

    A: The original resolution (No. DSH 1037) standardizes the specific sampling principles. At the same time, it standardizes the main factors that affect the series judgment. If there are the following differences, they are generally not treated as series:

    (1) Difference in size

    (2) Differences in chemical substances

    (3) Difference in voltage

    (4) Differences in materials of positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte

    (5) Differences in protection devices, including hardware and software

    (6) Safety design differences of batteries or batteries, such as bleed valves

    (7) Cells in series and parallel connection and their number differences, or

    (8) Differences in battery cell connection methods.

    Based on the strictness of the above specifications and the dangerousness of the battery, during actual testing and certification, the battery is basically a single model.

    Related terms:

    IECEE  International Electrotechnical Commission Conformity Assessment Scheme System

    NCB  National Certification Body

    IEC SC21A  IEC Battery Technical Committee

    WG4  IEC Battery Technical Committee Portable Battery Working Group

    CTL  Testing Laboratory Committee

    ETF13  Battery Expert Working Group

    DSH  resolution

    PDSH  Interim Resolution

    Reminder

    Under certain specific circumstances, the IEC standard needs to make necessary elaboration, specification or further clarification, and form a CTL (temporary) resolution when necessary. It is recommended that you fully understand and implement the battery IEC standard and CTL (temporary) resolution based on the above discussion.

    ZRLK has focused on battery product testing and certification for 15 years, always paying attention to changes in national laws and regulations, and providing customers with one-stop testing and certification services to ensure that your products quickly enter the target market. If you have batteries and battery-containing consumer smart products that need to be tested and certified, please feel free to contact us, our engineers will serve you as soon as possible!

    Related Articles
    • How do smart desk lamps pass CE certification? ZRLK is your escort

    • Sodium battery UN38.3 certification: a key link to ensure product safety and compliance

    • CCC certification points of large capacity charging box: battery, headphones can not be less

    • CCC certification of the earphone charging case: The rated capacity of the battery cell is less than 600mAh.

    Follow Us
    男人j进入女人j内部免费网站| 亚洲乱码国产一区三区| 双乳被老汉揉搓a毛片免费观看| 视频在线观看91| 精品久久久久久亚洲综合网| 国产无套中出学生姝| 乱中年女人伦AV一区二区| 91人妻在线| 亚洲熟女综合色一区二区三区| mm131美女图片高清图片视频| 亚洲ⅴs欧洲无码久久久| 日韩精品视频一区二区三区| 午夜免费福利小电影| 亚洲国产成人久久综合碰碰| 超碰97久久国产精品牛牛| 97久久超碰福利国产精品…| 妺妺窝人体色WWW婷婷| 吃奶呻吟打开双腿做受动态图| 国产女人高潮视频在线观看| 国产女人乱人伦精品一区二区| 亚洲av中文无码字幕色三| 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕| 国产三级网站在线观看| 久久中文字幕乱码久久午夜| 羞羞视频在线观看| 永久黄网站免费视频性色| 99久久久精品免费观看国产| 巨大黑又大又粗猛爽视频| 18禁止看的免费污网站| 精品国产麻豆免费人成网站| 日本一二三区视频在线| 三级国产视频| 最近中文字幕MV免费高清在线| 亚洲成av人片在线观看www| 97在线视频人妻无码| 怀孕挺大肚子疯狂高潮av毛片| 国产乱视频在线观看| 无码精品国产va在线观看| 亚洲av无码片在线观看| 男人的天堂av网站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区|